SETTLEMENT OF CASES CONCERNING THE CONNECTION OF CORRUPTION CRIMINAL ACTS COMMITTED JOINTLY BETWEEN TNI MEMBERS AND CIVILIANS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47652/metahukum.v4i2.750Keywords:
Criminal Acts, Corruption, Connectivity.Abstract
Corruption can be committed by any member of society. It is possible that it is committed by members of the TNI together with civilians, who formally must be tried legally in a connectivity court. Based on this, the problem in this thesis is how to regulate the law on the settlement of corruption through connectivity courts, how is the mechanism for handling connectivity cases in corruption cases, what are the obstacles to resolving corruption through connectivity courts. The obstacle to resolving corruption crimes through connectivity trials is the procedure which is too complicated and long because the formation of the connection case investigation team is formed based on a joint decree between the TNI Commander and the Supreme Court. In addition, the Supreme Court and the Minister of Defense must also reciprocally propose the appointment of member judges who will handle connectivity cases.
References
Bambang Sunggono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Perkasa
Frans Maramis. 2012. Hukum Pidana Umum dan Tertulis di Indonesia. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Leden Marpaung. 2011. Unsur-Unsur Peerbuatan yang Dapat Dihukum (Delik). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Mahrus Ali, 2011. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
M. Hamdan. 2015. Tindak Pidana Suap dan Money Politics. Medan: Pustaka Bangsa Press.
Moeljatno. 2018. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
M. Yahya Harahap. 2010. Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP, Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi dan Peninjauan Kembali. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Akhyaruddin, A., Marzuki, M., & Mukidi, M. (2023). ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG DARI HASIL TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 250 K/Pid.Sus/2018). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.420
Akhyar, A., Danialsyah, D., & Bukhari, B. (2023). ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN DISERTAI PEMERKOSAAN (Analisis Putusan Nomor 271/Pid.B/2019/PN Mrb). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.421
Simalango, D. ., Marzuki, M., & Mukidi, M. (2023). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA OLEH KURATOR ATAS TINDAKANNYA YANG MERUGIKAN BUNDEL PAILIT (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 2081/Pid.B/2011/PN.Jkt.Pst). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.422
Sianipar, E. P. U. ., Lubis, M. Y. ., & Akhyar, A. . (2023). ANALISIS YURIDIS PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PERMUFAKATAN JAHAT (SAMENSPANNING) DALAM KEJAHATAN NARKOTIKA YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH ANAK (Studi Putusan Nomor 57/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Lbp). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.423
.png){kind=logo}
