LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF UNILATERAL REVOCATION OF A POWER OF ATTORNEY BY A CLIENT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF A RECIPIENT AGREEMENT IN THE GRANTING OF POWER OF ATTORNEY TO SETTLE CIVIL CASES IN COURT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47652/metahukum.v3i3.723Keywords:
Legal Consequences, Revocation, Power of AttorneyAbstract
Representative institutions are widely used in practice because they can facilitate the journey through legal traffic. This representation gives rise to the giving of orders and the person who has been given power of attorney can carry out the legal act on behalf of the person who gave the power of attorney or it can also be said that he represents the principal acting in law. This means that what he does is at the expense of the principal and all his rights and obligations arising from the actions he does become the rights and obligations of the person who gave the power of attorney. The formulation of the problem in this study is how the legal regulation of the power of attorney agreement for the settlement of civil cases in court, what is the legal responsibility if one party defaults in the power of attorney agreement for the settlement of civil cases in court, what are the legal consequences of unilateral revocation of the power of attorney in the power of attorney agreement for the settlement of civil cases in court from the perspective of a reciprocal agreement.
References
M. Ali Hasan, Berbagai Macam Transaksi Dalam Islam (Fiqh Muamalah), Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2013.
Munir Fuady, Hukum Kontrak Dari Sudut Pandang Hukum Bisnis, Citra Aditya Bhakti, Bandung 2014.
Purwahd Patrik, Pembahasan Perkembangan Hukum Perjanjian, Fakultas Hukum UGM, Yogyakarta, 2010.
Richard Burton Simatupang, Aspek Hukum Dalam Bisnis, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 2013.
Soerjono Soekanto, Bantuan Hukum Suatu Jaminan Tinjauan Sosio Yuridis, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 2013.
Akhyaruddin, A., Marzuki, M., & Mukidi, M. (2023). ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG DARI HASIL TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 250 K/Pid.Sus/2018). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.420
Akhyar, A., Danialsyah, D., & Bukhari, B. (2023). ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN DISERTAI PEMERKOSAAN (Analisis Putusan Nomor 271/Pid.B/2019/PN Mrb). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.421
Simalango, D. ., Marzuki, M., & Mukidi, M. (2023). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA OLEH KURATOR ATAS TINDAKANNYA YANG MERUGIKAN BUNDEL PAILIT (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 2081/Pid.B/2011/PN.Jkt.Pst). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.422
.png){kind=logo}
