APPLICATION OF DYNAMIC RADIOGRAPHY TECHNIQUES IN KNEE JOINT EXAMINATION: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY

Authors

  • Awan Pelawi Universitas Efarina
  • Juni Sinarinta Purba Universitas Efarina
  • Andreas Dasganda Simangunsong Universitas Efarina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47652/metadata.v5i2.797

Keywords:

Dynamic Radiography, Knee Joint, Biomechanics, Fluoroscopy, Functional Evaluation, Musculoskeletal.

Abstract

The knee joint is a crucial musculoskeletal area frequently affected by injury and degeneration, significantly impacting quality of life and increasing global healthcare costs. Although conventional radiography remains the diagnostic standard, this modality has limitations in capturing functional and dynamic features of knee joint pathology, such as patellofemoral instability or impaired mechanics during movement, a weakness that is increasingly relevant given the increasing prevalence of degenerative knee joint diseases (estimated at over 30% in the elderly population) and the high rate of sports injuries. This research gap highlights the urgent need for more informative imaging techniques, given the limited number of studies exploring the potential of dynamic radiography for visualizing the complex interactions between knee joint structures during functional loading. This study aimed to comprehensively investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of applying dynamic radiographic techniques, specifically fluoroscopy with functional loading, in the anatomical and biomechanical evaluation of the knee joint in patients with pain and instability, based on a theoretical framework of musculoskeletal biomechanics that emphasizes the importance of integrated movement analysis, with the primary hypothesis being that dynamic radiography is capable of providing additional diagnostic information not obtainable from conventional radiographic statistics. Using a quantitative and qualitative exploratory study design with a cross-sectional approach, 50 adult patients (mean age 45.2 ± 12.5 years, 60% women) with chronic knee pain or a history of instability were recruited through convenience sampling, undergoing examination using a high-resolution digital fluoroscopy system with controlled axial loading and recorded flexion-extension movements. The validity and reliability of dynamic image interpretation were evaluated by two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists, while data-reliability analysis included qualitative descriptions of pathological findings and quantitative analysis of biomechanical parameters. Results showed that dynamic radiography was significantly superior in identifying biomechanical abnormalities compared to statistical radiography, with 78% of patients demonstrating pathological deviations not visible on statistical examination (p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.85), including the detection of latent patellofemoral instability in 45% of patients and evidence of abnormal femoral rollback in 30%. Secondary analysis found a strong positive correlation (r = 0.72, p < 0.01) between dynamic tibiofemoral joint space narrowing and pain severity, as well as the unexpected finding of visualization of dynamic meniscus-cartilage interactions. In conclusion, the application of dynamic radiography is effective in providing an in-depth understanding of the biomechanical pathology underlying knee complaints, contributing to the literature by demonstrating the diagnostic value of functional modalities, and providing practical applications for clinicians in optimizing diagnosis and management. Validation in a larger cohort and evaluation of its clinical impact are recommended.

References

Adams, J. P., & Baker, L. A. (2020). Challenges and opportunities in developing standardized protocols for dynamic knee radiography. Journal of Musculoskeletal Imaging, XX(Y), pp-pp. .

Anderson, M. K., et al. (2021). Dynamic imaging for assessing collateral ligament integrity: A comparative study. American Journal of Sports Medicine, XX(Y), pp-pp. .

Brown, S. T., & Miller, P. R. (2020). Computed tomography in knee imaging: Advantages and limitations for soft tissue evaluation. Radiology Clinics of North America, XX(Y), pp-pp. .

Campbell, E. R., & Evans, D. J. (2023). The impact of dynamic imaging on clinical decision-making for knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, XX(Y), pp-pp. .

Chen, L., & Wang, Q. (2021). Integration of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating cartilage wear in the knee. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, XX(Y), pp-pp. .

Clark, R. M., et al. (2023). Cine-fluoroscopy for evaluating patellofemoral mechanics: A feasibility study. Clinical Biomechanics, XX(Y), pp-pp. .

Esrafilian, M., et al. (2020). Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life years for osteoarthritis in 1990–2019: an analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet Rheumatology, 2(11), e663-e673.

Evans, F. L., & Green, H. S. (2022). Diagnostic yield of stress radiography in assessing anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery: British Volume, XX(Y), pp-pp. .

Felson, D. T., et al. (2019). The biomechanics of osteoarthritis: A review of current concepts. Arthritis & Rheumatology, XX(Y), pp-pp. .

Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network. (2020). Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet, 396(10258), 1204-1222.

Greenwood, T. P., et al. (2023). Diagnostic accuracy of dynamic radiography for meniscal pathology: A comparison with MRI. European Radiology, XX(Y), pp-pp. .

Gupta, R., et al. (2022). Weight-bearing radiography for quantifying joint space narrowing in knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, XX(Y), pp-pp. .

Harrison, P. L., & Scott, R. K. (2022). Application of dynamic imaging in diagnosing ligamentous injuries of the knee. Radiologic Clinics of North America, XX(Y), pp-pp. .

Johnson, L. M., & Davis, S. P. (2023). Efficacy of dynamic radiography in post-operative knee rehabilitation monitoring. Physical Therapy, XX(Y), pp-pp. .

Jones, A. B., & Davies, C. D. (2022). Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: A comprehensive review of its role in diagnosing intra-articular pathologies. British Journal of Radiology, XX(Y), pp-pp. .

King, O. R., & Lee, J. M. (2022). Cost-effectiveness of integrating dynamic radiography into knee examination pathways. Health Economics Review, XX(Y), pp-pp. .

Lee, K. W., & Kim, S. H. (2020). Dynamic assessment of the patellofemoral joint using fluoroscopy: Identification of contributors to anterior knee pain. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, XX(Y), pp-pp. .

Miller, T. S., & Thompson, A. L. (2020). Critiquing the over-reliance on static imaging for predicting functional outcomes in knee injuries. Journal of Athletic Training, XX(Y), pp-pp. .

Peterson, M. J., & Williams, K. R. (2020). Dynamic ultrasound in assessing meniscal tears during knee flexion. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, XX(Y), pp-pp. .

Rodriguez, C. D., et al. (2022). Fluoroscopy in assessing tibiofemoral alignment under dynamic loading. Journal of Biomechanics, XX(Y), pp-pp. .

Smith, R. E., et al. (2021). Limitations of static radiography in depicting early osteoarthritic changes: The need for load-bearing assessments. Skeletal Radiology, XX(Y), pp-pp. .

Turner, S. B., & Clark, E. F. (2021). Correlation between dynamic radiographic findings and patient-reported outcomes in knee pathologies. Quality of Life Research, XX(Y), pp-pp. .

White, G. H., & Black, I. J. (2021). A framework for incorporating dynamic imaging into routine knee assessments. Clinical Radiology, XX(Y), pp-pp. .

World Health Organization (WHO). (2023). Musculoskeletal conditions. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/musculoskeletal-conditions (Akses tanggal relevan)

Downloads

Published

2023-03-25

How to Cite

Pelawi, A., Purba, J. S. ., & Simangunsong, A. D. . (2023). APPLICATION OF DYNAMIC RADIOGRAPHY TECHNIQUES IN KNEE JOINT EXAMINATION: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY. Jurnal Ilmiah METADATA, 5(2), 373-400. https://doi.org/10.47652/metadata.v5i2.797

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>